Primal Fear: "Sooner or Later a man who wears two faces forgets which one is real".
Marty: So there never was a Roy?
Aaron: Jesus Christ, Marty. If that’s what you think, I’m disappointed in you. There never was an Aaron, counsellor.
The movie Primal Fear is a 1996 film featuring the mental disorder, Dissociative Identity Disorder, previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder. Martin plays the defence attorney for the murder of Chicago’s Archbishop, where the alter boy, Aaron is suspect. Aaron was seen fleeing from the crime scene with blood spluttered across his clothes, however he has no recollection of being at the crime scene as he ‘blacked out’.
This movie was captivating. The character of Aaron was extremely well scripted and the actor falls into my top 3 best actors, after watching this film.
I am now going to analyse the film and how in reality it would be impossible. However, this is only in the eyes of a student health professional, required to research the film. The average individual walks away flabbergasted and in awe of its story line.
Here is a critical analysis of the client’s diagnosis. A psychiatrist interviews Aaron throughout the film. When past experiences are brought up which have made him angry, Aaron often switches into the character of Roy. Roy is ill-tempered – becoming physically and verbally aggressive. The psychiatrist and lawyer soon realize it wasn’t Aaron that killed the Archbishop, but rather Roy. When coming out of Roy’s character Aaron blacks out and cannot remember those moments.
The psychiatrist diagnoses Aaron with DID as he suits the following criteria according to the DSM V: (a) a sudden transformation from one personality to the other (b) an alter personality representing different ways of acting to others (c) alter ego is a protector or avenger. However, Aaron reveals at the end of the movie to Martin, his lawyer, that there never was an Aaron. He has always been Roy and was malingering the DID in order to escape the death penalty in the court case.
This would never occur in reality as DID is present from childhood and reports of his DID would have been found in medical history files. If this was a case, even a single interview from one of the client’s friends would have explicitly uncovered the fact that his true personality is that of Roy.
Roy’s impeccable acting skills also made me question whether his stuttering and ‘black outs’, as Aaron, could have been so perfectly demonstrated for the pure purpose of malingering.
The DSM V does not consider malingering to be a mental disorder, but does note that malingering is often suspected in the presence of an anti-social Personality disorder. When Roy (Aaron) reveals to Martin that he was faking the DID he makes further claim that he killed his girlfriend Linda, because “she deserved it” and states that cutting up the Archbishop was a “work of art”. This is the first time we learn that Aaron also killed Linda and he clearly shows pride and pleasure in admitting to these heinous acts with no signs of remorse.
The correct diagnosis according to the DSM V would have been: Anti-social Personality Disorder. Aaron obviously fits many criteria for this disorder, including (a) failure to adhere to legal codes (b) aggressive and hostile behaviour (c) lack of truthfulness & (d) lack of remorse for good deeds.
Primal fear is another example of Hollywood filmmaking looking to make a psychological thriller, with a twist at the end – a common template for this type of movie. It works well, captivating a naïve audience who cannot help but fall in love with the patient’s intelligence to get away with murder. A review stated that the film would have been better if Marty had found out about the malingering earlier and was placed in a position of moral crisis. Nevertheless, it was an extremely interesting plot and is one of my new favourite films.
This film also made me question the diagnosis of the boy, which was discussed in an MDT meeting on our first day of prac at King Dinizulu Hospital. It was mentioned that the boy is a genius and that he states he puts on his different personas to become ‘ill’ and get rid of his mom’s boyfriends that he strongly dislikes. It was also stated that he has made strong suggestions of killing the boyfriend too. He always succeeds at getting rid of the disliked boyfriends. After watching the film, this patient sounds like he could be given the diagnosis of Antisocial Personality disorder and this was not uncovered as an option when discussing his case.
Primal fear film can be of use to students as it clearly demonstrates traits of DID, malingering and Antisocial Personality Disorder. I feel a main message for me that came from the film is that one must always be objective, unbiased and thorough in making a diagnosis, especially in such serious cases as murder trials. I believe this does relate to our profession as we do need to be aware of the fact that a diagnosis may be misconstrued and because medico-legal OT’s perform multiple assessments for court trials, which can impact greatly on a case outcome.
References:
1 Webermann, A. R., & Brand, B. L. (2017).
Mental illness and violent behavior: the role of dissociation. Retrieved from https://bpded.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/ on 30/08/19.
2 Wrobel, B. (2017). Primal Fear – Blog. Retrieved
from https://psychopathologyinfilmblog.wordpress.com/2017/10/06/primal-fear-1996/
on 29/08/19.
3 IMDb image. (1996). Movie review website
( Primal Fear). Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117381/mediaviewer/rm2713459712
on 31/08/19.
4 Dorwart, E. (2019). Analysis of Primal Fear –
Mistakes and Misdiagnosis. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/32654547/Analysis_of_Primal_Fear_Mistakes_and_Misdiagnoses
on 29/08/19.
Roy


