Every Multidisciplinary team is composed of
different professionals, possessing a variety of skills necessary to produce
safe and effective care.
This includes:
· general practitioners;
· practice nurses;
· allied health professionals such as physiotherapists, occupational
therapists, dieticians, psychologists, social workers, podiatrists and
Aboriginal Health Workers;
·
health educators - such as diabetes educators - providing promotion and
prevention clinics and other activities.
Multidisciplinary teams convey many benefits to both the patients and
the health professionals working on the team. These include improved health
outcomes and enhanced satisfaction for clients, and the more efficient use of
resources and enhanced job satisfaction for team members.
What
makes healthcare teams so different from those in other types of organisation
is that team members have differing allegiances, not only to the team but also
to their professional groups. History and professionalism play their part in making
questions of authority and responsibility in the health service team much more
complex. Clarity about authority and accountability in health care teams is essential.
To ensure optimal functioning of the team and effective patient
outcomes, the roles of the multidisciplinary team members in care planning and delivery
must be clearly negotiated and defined.
This requires:
·
respect and trust between team members;
·
the best use of the skill within the team;
·
agreed clinical governance structures;
·
agreed systems and protocols for communication and interaction between
team members.
I feel as though the Entabeni rehab and multidisciplinary team have made
an effort to show interest in us as students joining their team. They offer us
advice, communicate with us about changes and time slot conveniences and have
adapted to us being in their environment twice a week. We are blessed with the
staff the rehab has.
This week I performed a self-care grooming and LL dressing treatment sessions with Ms. Thobeka. The client also improved in her transfer abilities this week ,
as she was able to transfer from the wheelchair to the bed safely but with
supervision. However, she required help to transfer back to the wheelchair. The
client performed LL dressing and undressing with moderate assistance in a
sufficient time. The client was required to weight bear on the subluxated
affected right arm during grooming (Face washing and teeth brushing). I have
seen great improvement in the client’s dynamic sitting balance (Trunk control).
I have performed NDT techniques to improve her Trunk control each prac day.
Mrs Pillay is being discharged on Friday. This client’s dynamic standing
balance was my main focus of treatment in these last few weeks. In my session I
learnt the importance of ensuring the client is weightbearing on the affected
leg and not neglecting it. This was tricky to focus on when also assisting the
client with the co-ordination peg board activity. The client was asked to lift
her left heel to ensure weightbearing in the last 6 minutes of the activity and
the student therapist focused more on knee extension than the second half of the activity which was an easier task.
Through this activity the student noted the importance of adaptation to meet the aims and
the importance of multitasking as a therapist for all aspects of the sessions
requirements.
Unfortunately my client was unwell with stomach problems on Wednesday and I therefore didn't get to perform my last treatment session with her.
Mrs Mabongo is my new T6/7 SCI client. We performed a shuffling activity
today as the client struggled in this area when she was assessed. This is
important for mobilization to get into positions for therapy, as well as for
her transfer she performs at the moment with a transfer board. The client
understood the new techniques taught to her and great improvement was noted by the end of the
session through repetition. The client did not understand the initial game for
the pegboard despite multiple demonstrations and it was therefore downgraded to just removal of the pegs. The
activity required trunk rotation of the left and right side to improve trunk
control. It also incorporated weighted cuffs. My supervisor noted it wasn’t necessary. I agreed with this feedback as the
only step of the activity it may have improved MS for is the elevation and
reach the client was required to perform when removing the pegs. The client's heavy flaccid LL's provided enough resistance to increase MS of the UL's.
References:
1. Health One
NSW. (2014). Multidisciplinary Team Care. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/
healthone/Pages/multidisciplinary-team-care.aspx
2. Jenkins,
V. (2001). Multidisciplinart Teamwork: The good, bad and everything in between.
https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/10/2/65

No comments:
Post a Comment